20 Unsettling Facts About The UFO That Terrorized Gulf Breeze Florida

By Sarah Norman | December 13, 2023

The Bright Blue Beam

In the late 1980s, the small town of Gulf Breeze, Florida, became the epicenter of a series of strange and unexplained sightings. People reported seeing strange lights and UFOs in the sky, with a contractor named Ed Walters directly in the middle of the action. These sightings quickly gained national attention, and the Gulf Breeze UFO incident became one of the most well-known and controversial cases of its kind.

This story of extraterrestrial intrigue has it all: aliens, hypnosis, photographic evidence, and even a couple of bumbling UFO hunters.

But what really happened in Gulf Breeze, and is there any truth to the claims made by Walters? In this article, we'll take a closer look at the Gulf Breeze UFO incident and examine the evidence surrounding it. So, if you're curious about the mysterious world of UFO sightings and want to learn more about this fascinating case, keep reading.

test article image

On December 2, 1987, Walters reported that he had another experience with an alien craft. He claims that he was once again caught in a blue beam emitted by the UFO, where he was immobilized three feet off the ground. Walters writes of this experience in his book:

Something hit me. All over my body. I tried to lift my arms to point the camera. I couldn't move them. They were blue. I was blue. Everything was blue. I was in a blue light beam. The blue beam had hit me like compression. It was pressing me firmly, just enough to stop me from moving.

The Polaroids

test article image

The Polaroid photos presented by Walters, even if fake, are still a source of fascination in the UFO community. Journalist Daryl Frazell, who wrote about the Gulf Breeze Incident in 1990, noted that the objects in the images do not resemble saucers. Rather, they look more like Chinese lanterns or pregnant percolators with a bright disk at the base and a bulb on top, with two rows of windows or portholes in between.

Initially, the photographs were met with skepticism, with many suggesting they were double exposures. However, Bruce S. Maccabee, a government research physicist who investigated the sites and the cameras, concluded that there was no evidence of a hoax, and endorsed the photos as authentic in a report contained in a book.

While Maccabee conceded that the early snapshots were taken with an old Polaroid camera that made double exposures possible, Walters later used a newer model that ejected the film as soon as the shutter closed, making double exposures difficult. To further support his case, Walters constructed a stereo device consisting of two Polaroid cameras mounted at the ends of a board, which allowed for two slightly different views of the same scene. Maccabee believed that the possibility of Walters faking the entire series of photos with double exposures was negligible, especially since he was not an expert photographer.